Archbishop Williams,
Sharia, and Pathological Liars
by Khalid Jan
February 19, 2008
A ruthless campaign against Archbishop Rowan Williams was orchestrated by the British media,
along with some of his co-religionists to have him resign from his post for being
sympathetic to some aspects of Sharia.[1] He never proposed the establishment of a parallel Islamic
justice system.[2] Sharia councils are
functioning in the
Remarkable indeed is the fact that a six letter word “activated”
the frozen neurons of a multitude of pathological liars and sightless
skeptics. Just like a vulture ready to swoop down on its prey, they too
remain on their heels to devour anyone who utters the word Sharia.
If it is the secular-atheistic media which feels a
mental-electrocution upon hearing the word Sharia, it is to be expected of
them. But when a 4th degree Jesuit of the Roman Catholic “scholastic
order” jumps on the media’s bandwagon, it clearly demonstrates collective
secular-Christian focus to paint Islam in the most frightening way possible.[4]
In the eyes of Jesuit Father Samir Khalil Samir, Sharia is synonymous
with the oppression of women, wife-beating, polygyny,
and so forth. Let us for now put aside the “eruptive” word Sharia, and look at
the statistical data related to the condition of women in the
The
In his article “Sharia and English law: a weakened
As per The North American New Humanist Forum website, “Humanists
are internationalists, aspiring to a universal human nation. While
understanding the world they live in as a single whole, humanists act in their
immediate surroundings. Humanists seek not a uniform world but a world of
multiplicity: diverse in ethnicity, languages and customs; diverse in local and
regional autonomy; diverse in ideas and aspirations; diverse in beliefs,
whether atheist or religious; diverse in occupations and in creativity.”[11]
A number of European countries – including
Population growth in
When Muslim economic slaves were imported for greasing the
European machinery, expectation from the masters was that, in time, these
slaves will either embrace Christianity or adapt to a secular-atheistic way of
life. Since their intended plan didn’t unfold, it was time for the contingency
plan to be put into effect: attack Muhammad, the Quran, and Islam.[15]
The pornography of European SOCIAL-DECAY has reached its apex.[16] Neither their Christian
heritage nor their social norms have anything beneficial to offer to the rest
of humanity. A passive, feminized, Europeanized, and Christianized Jesus has
been, so far, unable to liberate the greater part of humanity from the sin of
disbelief and social misery.
Early European policy makers may have been smart, but definitely
not intelligent. Were they intelligent and wise, they would never have opted
for importing Muslim economic slaves. They could have adopted only one verse
from the Quran that allows a man to marry up to four wives. This way, the
native European population growth would have been astronomical. No need to pay
for sex and encourage prostitution, no trafficking of women for forced sex, no
sex tourism and no encouragement for having animals as sex partners.[17]
Islam, in essence, is a divinely revealed moral ideology. The
aim of its teaching is to take an agitated, extravagant, and unchecked human
and turn him/her into a God-conscious, morally sound, and obedient servant of
the Most High.
The respected late Pope John Paul II was strongly in favor of
continuous dialogue with Muslims; irrespective of any constructive outcome. The
then-cardinal Ratzinger, known for his hostility
towards Islam, agreed to engage in dialogue with Muslims if he could persuade
them to convert to Christianity – of course the Roman Catholic version.
Furthermore, the Nigerian Cardinal Francis Arinze is
reported to have said: “From sincere Muslims, Christians can learn, for
example, the courage of sincere prayer. They pray five times a day, and no
matter where they are – be it the railway station or the airport – they will do
it.”[18]
During such highly charged times, what prompted Archbishop Williams to say “he could foresee a place for aspects of Sharia law in
We may agree or disagree with the Archbishop’s “controversial”
statement, but credit must be given to him for his open, bold, and fearless
manner of speaking his mind.
[1] Archbishop is in shock as he faces demands to quit and
criticism from Lord Carey, http://www.thisislondon.co.uk, Feb 9, 08
[2] http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/02/10/europe/church10.php
[3] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/01/20/nsharia_120.xml
[4] Sharia and English law: a weakened
[5] Domestic violence against women: http://BMJ.com
1995;311:964-965 (14 October)
[6] Domestic violence: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk
[7] Statistics: http://www.amnesty.org.uk/index.asp
[8] http://www.24dash.com: December 13, 2006 [Social Housing and Public Sector news,
[9] http://www.news-medical.net/default.asp, October 2, 2006
[10] SEX SLAVES FOR SALE AT pounds 3,000 EACH, Graham Johnson,
Sunday Mirror, Dec 28, 2003
[11] http://www.humanism.org/what_is_new_humanism/humanist_statement.php
[12] http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,2144,1935900,00.html
[13] http://www.stanford.edu/group/i-rite/statements/2003/rytkonen.htm
[14] European Birth Rate Declines, AP, March 27, 2003
[15] The Crescent and the Conclave, http://www.asiatimes.com, April 19, 2005
[16] Sex and social suicide, Daily Mail, December 14, 2002
[17] A goat's eyes are so beautiful, Tanya Gold, http://www.newstatesman.com, May 17, 2004
[18] Issue for Cardinals: Islam as rival or partner in talks, Ian
Fisher, http://www.iht.com, April 12, 2005
[19] The Archbishop and Sharia: A Pas de Deux?, Peter G. Riddell, http://www.spectator.org, February 13, 2008
Posted February 27,
2008 with the author's permission.