A Gender Jihad For Islam's Future
by
Asra Q. Nomani
Barcelona
Several months ago, when a
group of Spanish Muslims approached city officials here about sponsoring a
conference on Islamic feminism, one responded, "Isn't that an
oxymoron?" That's what many people believe. To conservative Muslims, the
phrase is an insult to Islam. But to many moderate Muslims -- and I count
myself among them -- an Islamic feminist movement fits with the religion's
early teachings and offers one of our best hopes for countering extremism.
Indeed, those of us who have joined the movement since it emerged in the 1990s
have come to understand that Islam needs to go back to its progressive
7th-century roots if it is to move forward into the 21st century.
How difficult that is -- and
how important -- became clear to me when I joined the first International
Congress on Islamic Feminism, which was held in this Spanish city just over a
week ago. When the floor was opened for questions during one session, a young
Muslim man made the comment I've heard so often: "In Islam, there is no
place for feminism. . . ." Sitting on the dais, where I had just
chronicled our successful struggle to integrate some U.S. mosques, I took it in
stride. I've become accustomed to belittling comments, even death threats. But
what happened next stunned me.
From the middle of the
audience of some 250 women and men, Amina Wadud, a Muslim scholar of Islamic
studies who calls herself "a pro-faith feminist," stood up. "You
are out of order," she said to the man. "What you are doing is
exactly the kind of thing that we are here to be able to stop." The
audience broke into cheers. Another Muslim man tried to protest. I interrupted
him. "We're changing history today," I said. "We're not going to
shut up."
What stunned me was not only
the confidence with which we spoke but the willingness of the group to back us
-- 12 Muslim women scholars and activists who had been invited to attend the
conference by a small but ambitious group of largely Spanish Muslim converts,
the moderate Catalan Islamic Board.
The force of our collective
effort convinced me that we have the strength to challenge the men's club that
defines most of the Muslim world. It was an affirmation of the commitment that
had brought me and the 11 other participants here from as far away as Malaysia,
Mali, Nigeria, France, Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States and
refugee camps in the disputed territory of Western Sahara to share stories from
the trenches in the "gender jihad." We Muslim feminists view it as a
struggle that taps Islamic theology, thinking and history to reclaim rights
granted to women by Islam at its birth but erased by manmade rules and tribal
traditions masquerading as divine law.
In the communities where we
live, we have begun challenging customs that deny women rights from the mosque
to the bedroom: gender segregation, mandatory veiling, forced early marriages,
clitorectomies, polygamy, death for sex outside of marriage, domestic violence
and strict domestic roles. We have many Muslim men on our side: The chief
organizer of the conference was a man, Abdennur Prado, who hustled nonstop
behind the scenes. And we are taking a lead from Christian and Jewish women who
are generations ahead of us today in their efforts to challenge traditions that
block them from the workplace, the political arena and the pulpit.
To many, we are the bad girls
of Islam. But we are not anti-sharia (Islamic law) or anti-Islam. We use
the fundamentals of Islamic thinking – the Qur'an, the Sunnah, or
traditions and sayings of the prophet Muhammad, and ijtihad, or
independent reasoning -- to challenge the ways in which Islam has been
distorted by sharia rulings issued mostly by ultraconservative men.
We are wrestling with laws
created in the name of Islam by men, specifically eight men. The Muslim world
of the 21st century is largely defined by eight madhhabs, or
Islamic schools of jurisprudence, with narrow rulings on everything from
criminal law to family law: the Shafi, Hanafi, Maliki and Hanbali schools in
the majority Sunni sect; the Jafari and Zaydi schools, for the minority Shiite
sect; and the Ibadi and Thahiri schools among other Muslims. But the first
centuries of Islam's 1,400-year history were quite different -- characterized
by scores of schools of jurisprudence, many progressive and women-friendly. It
is not Islam that requires women to wear a headscarf, but rather the scholars
in the contemporary schools.
To many of the women I spoke
with, their struggle to move Islam forward by reaching back to its past
represents nothing short of a revolution. "This is a global
struggle," says Valentine Moghadam, a native of Iran and the chief of the
gender equality and development section of UNESCO in Paris. She sees the
movement as an important response to "frustration with Islamic
fundamentalism." And there is no doubt in my mind, either: The kind of
ideology that willingly subjugates women can also foster hatred.
From the dais, activists
dressed in everything from Parisian fashion to traditional African batik
offered powerful stories of regional reform. From Malaysia, Zainah Anwar,
executive director of the Sisters in Islam (dubbed "Satan in Islam"
by conservatives), laid out a strategy for reforming Islamic family law in her
country, by, for example, educating women about their right to refuse forced
marriages. And like others, she is looking beyond her country's borders for
support. The group's newsletter is being funded by the successful multinational
cosmetics company the Body Shop. And the group is calling Moroccan legal
experts to Malaysia next February to educate local leaders about the
progressive family reforms that Morocco passed last year. This month, Anwar and
other Sisters in Islam leaders will go to England to swap strategies with 10 Muslim
women's groups.
In some local areas, groups
like Anwar's have begun to see success. Peeking over her laptop and
occasionally adjusting the flowing white headscarf she chooses to wear,
Djingarey Maiga, the chief of a Mali-based group called Women and Human Rights,
explained how she started a rural radio program in her country to promote
women's rights. And BAOBAB, a Nigerian group founded in 1996, made headlines in
2003 when it helped win a victory for Amina Lawal, the mother sentenced to be
stoned to death for having a baby outside of marriage. Mufuliat Fijabi, a
senior program officer at BAOBAB, told us how a conservative sharia
judge broke with tradition not long ago to oppose marital rape after going
through training provided by his organization. One Nigerian imam, after
hearing BAOBAB's message encouraging ijtihad surprised BAOBAB organizers
by following up and encouraging Muslims to consider alternative schools of
thought.
The challenge isn't just in
poor villages in Nigeria or Mali. It's in the wealthy and supposedly
well-educated West. In 2003, I set off a debate over the rights of Muslim women
when I wrote in The Post's Outlook section about walking through the front door
of my hometown mosque in Morgantown, W.Va., and praying in the main hall, thus
defying an order that women enter through a back door and pray in a secluded
balcony. Since then, I've been harassed in mosques from New York City to
Seattle for refusing to accept separate quarters. After almost two years of
public campaigning with other women, the country's major Muslim organizations,
including the Islamic Society of North America, issued a 28-page report in July
titled, "Women Friendly Mosques and Community Centers: Working Together to
Reclaim Our Heritage," recommending reform, including an affirmative
action program to get women on mosque boards.
Our movement also caused a
stir earlier this year when Wadud led a congregation of about 125 women and men
in a New York prayer service. As the chief organizer, I wondered what the
impact of her action would be as I unfurled the massive roll of carpet I'd
purchased from the ABC home furnishing store to serve as our prayer rug. Many
clerics around the world attacked us at fiery Friday sermons for undermining
our religion, and Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi claimed that our prayer
"creates millions of bin Ladens" by challenging male authority. We're
up against a formidable machinery of opposition, but we're convinced that now
is the moment to coordinate the legal and policy reforms that Islamic feminism
is promoting. Initially, I thought it was time for a new madhhab. But
Islamic scholars have persuaded me that that would be too limiting. We need to
focus instead on broad societal initiatives.
We see our struggle as part
of a wider peace jihad. It was a national Islamic leader who oversees
the Catalan Islamic Board, Mansur Escudero, who issued the first fatwa against
Osama bin Laden, months before U.S. Muslim organizations issued their own. The
organizers of the conference say they don't accept support from Saudi Arabia,
which has funded much of the spread of ultraconservative Islamic orthodoxy in
the world.
At the Barcelona conference,
I proposed a plan called "The Islamic Dream" -- an effort to connect
our disparate efforts and develop a new approach for Islam in the 21st century.
I would like to see us organize a summit of Islam's progressive thinkers to
establish the terms of reform and define a 20-year plan to transform our world.
That is where we are headed.
During Wadud's presentation
on one of the last days of the conference, a Spanish American woman stood up
and asked: "Would you lead us in prayer today?" Wadud assented. A
group of about 30 Muslims gathered in a hotel conference room to pray behind
her, men and women standing shoulder to shoulder -- grounds for banishment in
mosques around the world. A Pakistani Canadian activist, Raheel Raza, ran to
join the line, not far from a Pakistani American scholar, Asma Barlas, dubbed
one of "the mothers of Islamic feminism." Together, we opened our
hands as Wadud prayed, "We ask for Your protection." Our prayer
complete, we declared with one voice, "Ameen." "Please
accept."
Author's e-mail: asranomani@theislamicdream.com
Asra Nomani, a former
reporter for the Wall Street Journal, is the author of the book "Standing
Alone in Mecca" (Harper San Francisco).
Posted November 23, 2005. The
above article was printed in the November 6, 2005 edition of the Washington
Post. It is posted here with the permission of the author.